Global Immigration Blog : Immigration Lawyers & Attorneys : Jackson Lewis Law Firm : Labor Certification, Adjustment of Status

Employers navigating the I-9 employment eligibility verification process for new hires are confronted with a gauntlet of confusing rules, standards, and exceptions to the rules that some have opined are deliberately designed to make the innocuous looking one-page form a magnet for errors. Such cynics cite the year-over-year increases in civil fines being levied by ICE on employers through the continuing national workplace audit campaign the agency is prosecuting as proof of a fatally flawed system.

While the social security number is an optional field on the form according to the latest M-274 Handbook for Employers, the forms will be considered deficient and employers may be subject to fines based on a variety of issues which may appear to be “harmless error” from a common sense perspective, including among others: missing date, signature on the wrong line, notation to “see attached” copies of identification, correct ID data listed in under the wrong list, etc. Employers who have been through the experience of an I-9 audit have become sensitive to the precision required in completing the forms fully, and ICE’s audit and public relations campaigns have conditioned employers to err on the side of completeness in this arena for fear of being heavily fined.

Unfortunately, rules governing I-9 form practice and fines do not focus exclusively on the issue of incompleteness. Employers who fail to walk the legal tightrope of “just enough, but not too much” risk incurring the wrath of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC). The DOJ has announced that a public employer has been sued for alleged Immigration–Related Employment Discrimination for too zealously checking the work authorization of foreign employees. The employer allegedly discriminated by dictating what documents a foreign employee must present at hire, contrary to the I-9 rule which mandates that the employee be given a choice of what to present. Similarly, lawful permanent residents were allegedly required to bring in updated work authorization documents when their current “green card” documents expired or they would risk termination, contrary to I-9 work authorization re-verification rules.

The bottom line for employers is that in their management of I-9 employment eligibility verification, keeping the “Goldilocks principle” in mind and treating all employees the same regardless of their citizenship or national origin is key to avoiding liability with either ICE on the one hand, or OSC on the other hand.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office has announced it will notify 1,000 employers across the country the agency will audit their hiring records to determine compliance with employment eligibility verification laws. These Notices of Inspection (NOIs) often request not only I-9 documentation, but payroll records, copies of immigration filings, copies of Social Security Administration communications requesting corrections, information on independent contractors, and related information. All documentation normally must be produced within three business days of the employer’s receiving the Notice.

ICE says the employers targeted are those whose businesses have a key role in keeping national infrastructure safe. The 17 sectors singled out for the enforcement action include those associated with agriculture and food, financial services, commercial nuclear reactors, drinking water and water treatment, postal and shipping, healthcare, and transportation. According to ICE, “The inspections will touch on employers of all sizes and in every state in the nation, with an emphasis on businesses related to critical infrastructure and key resources.”

In February, ICE had investigated 1,000 employers. This latest action continues the upward trend of yearly audits, bring the number of I-9 audits for fiscal year 2011 to more than 2,300. The agency conducted 2,196 audits in fiscal year 2010 and 1,444 in fiscal year 2009. For more information on how to get your company prepared for such an audit, see our I-9 compliance tips.

Fraud Detection Unit

In addition to the I-9 inspections, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, another arm of the DHS, has again stepped up its efforts to investigate and combat fraudulent use of immigration programs. The Fraud Detection Unit first started making random site visits in late 2009. A visit usually involves an unannounced drop-in by a USCIS agent or contractor who reviews the employment conditions of a nonimmigrant worker, usually H-1B employees. The agent will request to speak to the employee, review the workplace, and review payroll and related records. For a more detailed description of a site visit, see H-1B Employers: Prepare for Site Visits From USCIS.

What Employers Can Do

These government crackdowns on employers represent a key part of DHS’s immigration enforcement policy, emphasizing employer audits rather than the high-profile workplace raids of the past. It appears employers will continue to be targeted.  If you receive a Notice of Inspection, immediately contact your counsel. The window for response is short. It is critical that employers review thoroughly the documents gathered in response to the Notice and that the documents be well-organized and presented in the best light possible.

Employers who have not received a Notice this time around should take the opportunity to review and audit their records internally. For more information on how our Global Immigration Practice Group can assist you, see ourI-9 Compliance Brochure.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

OCAHO Reduces Fines Sought by ICE after I-9 Audit

Author: Nicola Ai Ling Prall, Esquire

With news of record-breaking immigration enforcement results and the new Employment Compliance Inspection Center, pressure on employers regarding Form I-9 compliance may seem unrelenting. However, a recently published decision by the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer appears to give employers greater negotiating power, a glimmer of good news. 

The Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer has jurisdiction over cases involving allegations of knowingly hiring, recruiting or referring for a fee or continued employment of unauthorized aliens, and failure to comply with employment verification requirement (completion of Form I-9), in violation of section 274A of the INA (Immigration and Nationality Act). If an investigation by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) results in a finding of a violation of section 274A, ICE may issue a Notice of Intent to Fine (NIF) to the employer. The NIF details the violations and the fines for those violations. The employer must either pay the fine or request a hearing. 

 USA v. Snack Attack Deli, Inc., 10 OCAHO no. 1137, arose from an ICE inspection conducted in early 2009 on Snack Attack Deli, a Subway franchisee located in Fayetteville, North Carolina. ICE alleged that Snack Attack had committed 108 violations of section 274A. In Count 1, the agency alleged that Snack Attack hired 11 named individuals from 2006 through February 2009 and failed to ensure that those individuals properly completed section 1 of form I-9 or failed itself to properly complete section 2 or section 3 of the form. Count II alleged that Snack Attack hired 97 named individuals between 2006 and February 2009 for whom it failed to prepare forms I-9 at all. 

ICE sought $1,028.50 for each violation, a total fine of $111,078.00. These fines were close to the maximum that ICE could have assessed under the law. Furthermore, a fine of that size would have crippled Snack Attack’s business and likely lead to the loss of jobs for some of its employees. None of the violations involved allegations of knowingly hiring or employing unauthorized aliens. The entire fine was based on Snack Attack’s alleged failure to comply with employment verification requirements by improperly completing or failing to complete Form I-9.

While the administrative law judge (ALJ) granted the agency’s motion for summary judgment as to liability, the ALJ found the fines were disproportionate to the size of the business and that ICE did not properly consider the fact that Snack Attack had no unauthorized workers and no previous violations. Furthermore, the ALJ took into consideration non-statutory factors “such as the depressed economy and the difficulty any displaced employee would have in finding other work.” Therefore, instead of $1,028.50 per violation, the ALJ reduced the fine to $300 for each violation of Count 1 and $250 for each violation of Count II, a total fine of $27,150.00.

This decision is useful for employers facing potential fines from ICE investigations – especially as economic depression and high unemployment continue.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office has told 1,000 employers across the country the agency will audit their hiring records to determine compliance with employment eligibility verification laws. These Notices of Inspection (NOIs) often request not only I-9 documentation, but payroll records, copies of immigration filings, copies of Social Security Administration communications requesting corrections, information on independent contractors, and related information. All documentation normally must be produced within three business days of the employer’s receiving the Notice.

ICE takes the position that such inspections determine whether or not businesses are violating U.S. employment laws by hiring illegal workers and will discourage such hiring practices in the future. According to a statement issue by ICE, the audits are not aimed a particular targets, but “touch on employers of all sizes and in every stated in the nation – no one industry is being targeted nor is any one industry immune from scrutiny.” The agency has not released the names and locations of the businesses targeted in this round of audits. ICE has acknowledged that the 1,000 businesses receiving NOIs were selected by local Special Agents in Charge (SAC) offices.

This latest effort reflects ICE’s focus on increasing I-9 audits as part of a worksite enforcement strategy emphasizing criminal prosecution of employers who knowingly hire individuals without authorization to work in the U.S. In fiscal year 2010, ICE conducted 2,196 I-9 audits (compared with 1,444 in fiscal year 2009), which included at least two major I-9 audit initiatives: one in July 2009 targeting 654 businesses and another in November 2009 targeting 1,000 companies associated with critical infrastructure. The I-9 audit initiative has the support of Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.

If you receive a Notice of Inspection, immediately contact your counsel. The window for response is short, but, in some cases, experienced practitioners may be able to assist in obtaining an extension of the document production period. It is critical that employers review thoroughly the documents gathered in response to the Notice, that it be well-organized and presented in the best light possible.

Employers who have not received a Notice this time around should take the opportunity to review and audit their records internally. Compliance efforts now will help avert potential fines that can range from $110 - $16,000 per violation, depending on the offense. For more information on how the Global Immigration Practice Group can assist you, see our I-9 Compliance Brochure.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Due to the dramatic increase in ICE worksite enforcement actions in 2009, employers are taking steps ensure their I-9 compliance, and utilizing such tools as internal audits, training, and implementation of I-9 software. I-9 software can often help to minimize the disorganization and clerical errors that can result in an absolute nightmare upon receipt of an ICE inspection notice. In response to growing employers’ compliance efforts, software companies are rushing “feature-rich” I-9 software packages to market. And while employers tend to scrutinize the user features available when selecting I-9 software, many are overlooking a vital feature – data security.

Once I-9 software has been implemented by your company, proper data security is required to protect your employees’ stored personal data. Minnesota state agencies using a Texas-based I-9 software provider with inadequate data security recently discovered that the personal data of nearly 500 employees may have been made accessible through the software provider’s web site, displaying employee names, dates of birth, hire dates, and Social Security numbers. This is a wake-up call to many employers that data security is a feature that cannot be overlooked when selecting I-9 software.
Employers should always ask their software provider to outline the software’s data security features. Compare them to features offered by other providers. Generally, you want to ensure that all user accounts are properly password protected, a sophisticated encryption method is used to encrypt the data, and if the data is stored remotely by the software provider, measures are taken to ensure that data is protected from external hackers and that the data is properly isolated to ensure that it is not erroneously accessed by another user.
I-9 software is an excellent tool to use in the quest for I-9 compliance, and a fear of a potential data compromise should not prevent you from implementation. Most software packages have adequate data security features, and a few have substantial ones. However, employers should be aware of the importance of data security when shopping for an I-9 software package, and should move data security to the top of their list of questions for their potential providers.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link