Global Immigration Blog : Immigration Lawyers & Attorneys : Jackson Lewis Law Firm : Labor Certification, Adjustment of Status

Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) John Morton has announced record numbers of worksite enforcement investigations, criminal prosecutions, and administrative-fine-awards for FY2011.

As the investigative arm of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, ICE’s primary mission is to promote homeland security and public safety through the criminal and civil enforcement of federal border control, customs, trade, and immigration laws.

As a primary part of its immigration enforcement effort ICE has targeted employers that recruit, hire, and continue to employ unauthorized foreign nationals. ICE’s comprehensive worksite enforcement strategy is focused on deterring unlawful employment. ICE believes its increased investigative activity will have the effect or driving all employers toward instituting fairly conservative standard operating procedures to cultivate a culture of compliance with the nation’s immigration-related employment laws. In testimony before the House Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement, Morton indicated that the Administration is focused on conducting criminal investigations and prosecuting employers who exploit the verification system or abuse their employees.

As of September 17, 2011, ICE instituted 3,015 administrative/criminal investigations—a 54% increase over FY2008. In FY2010, ICE arrested and criminally prosecuted 196 owners, HR managers, and executives—a 45% increase over FY2008. ICE refused to release statistics on those employers subject to potential criminal prosecution who negotiated with ICE or U.S. Attorneys to enter into deferred prosecution agreements.

In FY2011, ICE issued a record 2,393 Notice of Inspection (for federal Forms I-9 and supporting documents), a more than 375% increase from that issued in FY2008.

ICE has issued 331 final administrative fine orders in FY2011, totaling more than $9 million in fines levied on employers (it issued to 18 final orders in FY2008, totaling $675,000 in fines). In addition, FY2010 worksite investigations resulted in a record $36.6 million in judicial fines, forfeitures, and restitution.

“Enforcing our immigration priorities and obligations is neither simple nor easy, and we are committed to getting it right. We all agree that we need fair, consistent, and enforceable immigration laws that encourage the free flow of commerce while respecting both security and the rights of individuals,” Morton said.

Employment verification compliance requirements are onerous, but employers must remain vigilant. Employers with multi-state locations also must consider supplemental state verification compliance requirements. To the extent that ICE must review an employer’s Forms I-9 prior to coming to a conclusion about the rate of employment of unauthorized foreign nationals, all employers are at risk. Now is the time to minimize exposure.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Alabama’s controversial requirement that school officials determine, prior to enrollment, whether a student is legally in the United States was blocked by the federal court of appeals on October 14, 2011. The Justice Department brought the lawsuit on the basis that the state law is pre-empted by federal immigration law.

Reports of bullying of children have increased since the passage of the Alabama law on June 9, 2011. In addition, parents have been pulling their children out of school for fear of exposing them to racial profiling, vigilante enforcement and removal from the United States. The full economic and social impact of Alabama’s and other states’ immigration laws is yet to be seen. Alabama is not the first state, nor will it be the last, to enact immigration provisions that will directly impact employers, employees and their families, as the nation struggles with the issue of immigration.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

AUTHOR: MAGGIE MURPHY 

Apologizing for inadequate outreach on its new protocol, the Citizenship & Immigration Service (CIS) has requested feedback on its “surprise” policy – implemented September 12 – to send original approval notices to Petitioners and Applicants directly, rather than the attorneys of record. Attorneys of record with properly filed Forms G-28 now receive unofficial “Courtesy Copy” approval notices. CIS said its new policy will ensure the original notices reach the Petitioner or Applicant and combat possible immigration service scams.

A number of immigration attorneys, including those from Jackson Lewis, complained of the sudden implementation of the policy and challenged the legality of such implementation. The regulations clearly state that notices shall be given to the attorney or representative of record.

When an attorney is hired to assist with an immigration filing, a number of safeguards are attendant to the attorney-client relationship, including:

• Document Integrity and Security – all notices and critical, original documents should be mailed to the attorney so that they can be verified to ensure the case was approved and the notice printed properly. The attorney is in the best position to advocate on behalf of the client to get any errors corrected. Similarly, most immigration attorneys are also responsible for case management tracking and other tasks that minimize the risk of extreme case delays and complications.

• Issues with I-9 Completion and Driver’s License Requirements – foreign nationals working in the U.S. in nonimmigrant status (e.g., H-1B, L-1, and O-1) are often required to show their original I-94 document when completing various state and federal applications. When a change or extension of nonimmigrant status is requested, the original approval notice contains the foreign national’s new I-94 card. Therefore, mailing to the wrong address can cause enormous delays and problems.

• Requests for Evidence Timing Deadlines – case processing often involves “Requests for Evidence (RFEs)” from the CIS, in which the adjudicating officer asks for information and documentation to supplement the case filing. RFEs are issued under strict processing deadlines, normally only 30 – 90 days. Failure to respond can result in a delay of the case, which can be detrimental to the foreign national’s status. Thus, RFEs “lost” in employer mailrooms or apartment buildings or temporary residences have resulted in employees losing work authorization and status.

Jackson Lewis is working with the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) to persuade the government to suspend the new policy.

CIS said it will review all comments, as well as examples sent in through its Office of Public Engagement about this policy, but the policy stands.

Jackson Lewis’ immigration team represents national employers of all sizes in various industries. We are experienced in quickly implementing filing strategies for our employer-clients who are filing I-129 and I-140 petitions on behalf of foreign national employees. Employers should alert their attorneys of any mail from the Department of Homeland Security or CIS immediately.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

AUTHOR - Sujata Ajmera

Most employers with foreign national employees know that working with the Department of Labor (DOL) is an essential first step to securing permanent residency status on behalf of those employees. The permanent employment certification process (the “labor certification” or “PERM” process) requires employers to work directly with the DOL on two occasions – first, to obtain a Prevailing Wage Determination from the DOL’s National Prevailing Wage Center (NPWC); and, second, to obtain a Permanent Labor Certification from the DOL’s Employment & Training Administration (ETA).

Traditionally, it takes approximately four weeks to get a Prevailing Wage Determination from the NPWC. There has never been a way to expedite issuance of a Prevailing Wage Determination. The wait is now longer.

Due to pending litigation against the DOL, there is now a significant backlog in the NPWC’s review and issuance of Prevailing Wage Determinations for PERM cases. Consequently, a Prevailing Wage Determination may take approximately 12 weeks. This has important implications for certain foreign workers.

The American Competitiveness Act of the 21st Century (AC-21), enacted in 2000, allows an employer to extend a qualifying employee’s H-1B status beyond the six-year maximum if a PERM application is filed on or before the expiration of the employee’s 5th year of H-1B status. The purpose of AC-21 is to minimize the adverse effect the lengthy employment-based permanent resident process has on an employer’s ability to retain qualified foreign national workers and to guarantee the employer the ability to engage in continuous, uninterrupted business throughout this process. Sponsoring employers are now finding themselves unable to secure AC-21 protection for employees whose 5th year of H-1B status expires within the next few months.

The unforeseeable, drastic delay in issuance of Prevailing Wage Determinations has not been addressed by the DOL. The agency has not provided a mechanism to expedite or prioritize wage issuance based on critical timing issues. Employers in this predicament are at risk of losing valuable employees or being forced to transfer them abroad (if possible) in order to remain compliant with applicable regulations.

From an employment law perspective, those employers who are in this predicament may have no option but to consider filing a federal court mandamus action to compel the DOL to adjudicate Prevailing Wage Determinations requests within a reasonable time. This may be the fastest and most effective way to remedy a very serious problem.

If you are an employer with foreign national employees who are at risk of losing AC-21 eligibility in the next several months, please contact a Jackson Lewis attorney to discuss the best strategy to satisfy your employment needs and obligations. We will continue to monitor development at the DOL and National Prevailing Wage Center.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link