Summer 2011 Worksite Enforcement Update - ICE Brings Heat and Fines to New England

The United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) has announced that, as at July 21, 2011, it has fined 14 employers in New England this year for hiring illegal aliens in violation of law.

The companies were the subject of an investigation and audit of their Form I-9 documents, which is part of ICE’s ongoing worksite enforcement strategy. Following investigation, the companies, located from Massachusetts to Maine, were subjected to fines ranging from $23,000 to more than $100,000.

Nationally, ICE has been pursuing a worksite enforcement strategy, launched in 2009, to reduce demand for illegal employment of aliens and to protect employment opportunities for America’s legal workforce. This strategy has focused on auditing and investigating employers suspected of hiring workers later determined to be unauthorized for employment in the United States.

As quoted by Bruce M. Foucart, Special Agent in charge of ICE in Boston:

“These settlements serve as a reminder to employers that ICE will continue to hold them accountable for hiring and maintaining a legal and compliant workforce. We encourage companies to take the employment verification process seriously.”

ICE’s continued focus on worksite enforcement warrants employers’ ensuring their compliance with the employment verification process. Employers must complete and retain a Form I-9 for every individual hired for employment in the United States. Each employee is required to provide the employer with proof that the employee is authorized to work in the United States. Failure to properly complete the employment verification process can lead, at a minimum, to fines or, depending on the seriousness of any uncovered violations, a criminal investigation of an employer by ICE.

The Global Immigration practice of Jackson Lewis routinely advises our clients in navigating the employment verification process.
 

Key Questions For Employers Using Electronic I-9 Vendors

                                                           Author: Nicola Ai Ling Prall

With employers’ increased use of electronic Forms I-9 and more states mandating use of E-Verify, a number of electronic I-9 and E-Verify vendors are offering services to help employers with these demands. However, difficulty can arise for employers if the ownership of data and the terms of that ownership are not clear, as illustrated by a recent lawwsuit.

Furthermore, some background screening providers, applicant tracking system providers, and all-in-one human resources solutions providers are reselling the electronic I-9 and E-Verify functions to third-party vendors, which can further complicate issues regarding data ownership and access.

While these services are useful and can streamline the on-boarding process, employers must be diligent to ensure that they maintain access to all I-9 and E-Verify data.

If audited by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) (see our earlier post, ICE to Issue 1,000 Audit Notices to Employers, Focus on Infrastructure Safety), employers have only three days to gather the requested information for ICE. Therefore, it is critical that employers can access their data quickly. When choosing an electronic I-9 provider or a system with a reseller arrangement, employers should ask:

1. Who owns the I-9 and / or E-Verify data?
2. Where is the data stored?
3. Is the data commingled with other employers’ data?
4. Can the employer request a backup of the I-9 and E-Verify data at any time?
5. What is the cost of a data backup?
6. In what format will the backup be provided?
7. What happens to the employer’s data if the vendor changes its resellers?
8. What happens to the employer’s data if the vendor or reseller goes out of business?

There are specific electronic I-9 retention system regulations that can affect every aspect of a vendor’s system and the employer’s relationship with the vendor. It is important that employers speak with experienced counsel before entering into an electronic I-9 or E-Verify vendor relationship.