Global Immigration Blog : Immigration Lawyers & Attorneys : Jackson Lewis Law Firm : Labor Certification, Adjustment of Status

Implementing a portion of the Border Security funding bill (Public Law 111-230) signed by President Barack Obama on August 13, USCIS has announced a new fee, in addition to existing fees, for certain H-1B and L-1 petitions. The new fee is $2,000 for certain H-1B and $2,250 for certain L-1 petitions.

The fee applies to petitioners who employ more than 50 workers in the U.S., with more than 50% of them in H-1B or L-1 status. The fee must be paid when an employer seeks an initial grant of H-1B or L-1 status, and when an existing H-1B or L-1 worker is seeking a change of employer.

USCIS notes that Form I-129, and accompanying instructions, will be modified to comply with the new law. In the interim, employers should address the fee requirement with a notation on their H-1B or L-1 applications.

See the USCIS announcement here:
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=27eac9514bb8a210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=5b33aca797e63110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

During the I-9 verification process, foreign-born employees often present a variety of Permanent Resident cards, commonly called “Green Cards.” However, for the last few decades, no version of the Permanent Resident card has been the color green.

USCIS announced on May 11 a new version of the Permanent Resident card will be issued. The card will include new, enhanced security features. (See USCIS Press Release, USCIS Q&A.) New, personalized elements of the card will make it more difficult to forge, and each card will contain a Radio Frequency Identification chip. Furthermore, the front of the card contains green-colored features, once again making the “Green Card” green!

The image below, provided by DHS, illustrates the security features on the new Permanent Resident card.

If you have any questions regarding the new Permanent Resident document, document verification, or the I-9 process in general, please let us know.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On April 9, 2010, USCIS announced that in the first week of accepting cap-subject H-1B filings for FY 2011, only 13,500 petitions had been received against the 65,000 regular cap and only 5,600 against the 20,000 master’s cap.

New H-1B visas are generally limited to 65,000 per fiscal year, with an extra 20,000 available to certain individuals with advanced degrees (the master’s cap). The fiscal year begins on October 1, and petitions are accepted beginning April 1.

The first week’s filings represent the fewest H-1B petitions initially filed in several years. In previous years, USCIS had received a substantially greater number of petitions on April 1 than H-1Bs available. Such a situation required lotteries to determine which petitions would be accepted for adjudication. The last lottery was held in 2008, when USCIS received over 160,000 initial H-1B petitions.

No lottery was held last year, where after the first week of filing, USCIS had received over 30,000 regular cap petitions and close to 20,000 master’s cap petitions. USCIS continued to accept applications for new H-1Bs until the limit was reached on December 21, 2009.

It appears that employers now have some flexibility in bringing on new H-1B workers for a start date of October 1, 2010 or later.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Extraordinary Ability (EB1) immigrant visa category, as the name suggests, is set aside for immigrants who possess extraordinary ability in their fields. Unlike the case of other visa categories, individuals in this category may submit petitions for themselves. It also avoids the backlogs in other visa categories and is commonly used by artists, entertainers and researchers. 

To qualify, an individual must provide evidence of (1) a one-time achievement that is of a major, international significance (the Nobel Prize is the standard example), or (2) at least three out of ten lesser types of accomplishments, as defined by regulations.

Although the regulatory framework has remained unchanged for years, USCIS has varied its interpretation of “extraordinary.” Recently, it has sought to impose requirements beyond those included in the regulations. Rather than accept evidence of three lesser accomplishments to show extraordinary ability, USCIS routinely has required applicants to prove how each accomplishment shows that they are extraordinary. 

For example, the agency required a researcher to show how his publications have changed the way researchers viewed the area of science, even though the regulations only require the applicant to have authored publications. In another instance, the applicant was expected to show that he was selected to conduct peer review because of his extraordinary ability despite the fact the regulations require only that the individual has done peer review. 

Kazarian v. USCIS may help check the USCIS’s excesses, at least in the Ninth Circuit. On March 4, 2010, the Court found "neither USCIS nor an [Administrative Appeals Office] may unilaterally impose novel substantive or evidentiary requirements beyond those set forth [in the regulations]." Specifically, the Court found improper the agency’s denial of a visa to Poghos Kazarian because of his failure to demonstrate the “research community's reactions to his publications." Ultimately, Kazarian did not qualify for the visa, but the Ninth Circuit’s affirmation that USCIS cannot impose new requirements on applicants arbitrarily is a major win for Extraordinary Ability applicants. (The Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction over Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.)

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Fraud Detection Unit of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (PDF) (USCIS) has initiated thousands of unannounced site visits to employers with H-1B employees. Although the vast majority of site visits go smoothly, this program can be intimidating and create a chilling effect for employers who wish to pursue the H-1B program appropriately. Employers who do not file accurate H-1B applications may have their petitions revoked, and, in cases of severe abuse, further investigation could lead to civil penalties and criminal prosecution.

Conscientious employers generally do not have to fear a site visit, but should understand them and know how to respond. A site visit will occur at the employer’s location or employee’s worksite. The USCIS investigator generally will ask for the signer of the immigration forms, but may ask for another company official. The investigator will seek to review information from the immigration petition regarding the employer’s business and the employee's job title, duties, work location, and salary.

If you have H-1B employees, prepare for the strong likelihood of a site visit. This means maintaining accurate immigration documentation and becoming knowledgeable aboutthe information they contain. If the H-1B employee is not on site, be sure that there is a person at the location who knows how to respond to an audit.

If you are audited, take careful notes, including the name, title, and contact information of the investigator. If possible, have a witness who also prepares detailed notes of the visit.
If you are unsure how to answer the investigator’s question , simply say that you will follow up after the visit. If any issues arise during the site visit or if you have other concerns, ask to have your immigration lawyer present in person or by telephone.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link